Episode 34 — Ticketing as Evidence (Approvals, Change, Incidents)
Ticketing systems provide the audit backbone for approvals, changes, incidents, and exceptions, turning ephemeral conversations into durable records. The exam will expect you to tie SOC 2 controls to specific ticket fields: requester, approver, timestamps, risk classification, test results, and closure notes. Strong implementations standardize templates so a reviewer can verify that required steps occurred, such as peer review for code changes or managerial approval for access elevation. Linking tickets to commits, pull requests, playbooks, and monitoring alerts builds traceability across the lifecycle. Without this rigor, evidence devolves into screenshots and anecdotes that fail to prove period-wide operation.
Operational best practices include enforcing mandatory fields, routing by risk tier, and using automation to prevent deployment without an approved ticket or to auto-create incident tickets from critical alerts. Create views that match audit populations—for example, “all production changes during the period” or “all Sev-1 incidents and postmortems.” Embed acceptance criteria and attach artifacts like test results, rollback plans, or customer communications. For access requests, ensure separation of duties by requiring a manager and system owner approval, with the ticket ID referenced in IAM logs. Close the loop by linking problem records to corrective actions and tracking due dates. This disciplined use of ticketing reduces sampling disputes, accelerates walkthroughs, and demonstrates a culture where decisions and actions are consistently documented and reviewable. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
